Integrating evidence-based practice into the diabetes nurse curriculum in Bergen

Perceived barriers to finding, reading and using research in practice

Authors

  • M Graue
  • RØ Bjarkøy
  • MM Iversen
  • A Haugstvedt
  • J Harris

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1002/edn.148

Keywords:

Evidence-based practice, barriers to evidence transfer, postgraduate diabetes

Abstract

Abstract

Background: There is rising international interest in developing healthcare systems that are built on the basis of best evidence. However, it is a challenge to integrate evidence-based practice skills into existing educational courses, in a manner that enables students to interpret and use such skills effectively.

Aims: To study students’ abilities to find, read and critique research literature and to explore students’ perceptions of barriers to implementing evidence-based knowledge and skills into their practice.

Methods: An evidence-based approach was integrated into the curriculum of a postgraduate diabetes education programme. At the start of the course and after its completion, questionnaire data were collected to assess students’ ability to find, read and critique research literature, and students’ perceptions of barriers to implementing new knowledge and skills into practice. Qualitative data on barriers to transferring evidence into practice were also collected.

Results: Thirty-three experienced nurses (all female), mean age 40 years (SD 7.7; range 28–52 years), mean work experience 12.8 years (SD 7.9; range 3–30 years) attended the course and completed the initial questionnaire. By the end of the course, three students (9%) had left because of maternity leave or health issues, and six students (18%) did not return the final questionnaires. The remaining students reported greater ability to find and critique research literature (increasing respectively from 6.7% to 40.0% and from 27.3% to 41.7% during the course). Perceived barriers of using research in practice were: lack of time (69.7%); workplace environment (30.4%); structural and organisational problems (25.0%). The qualitative findings indicated that hierarchy, fear of negative judgements, competing demands, and fear of change were perceived barriers.

Conclusion: Students commented that the course had provided them with enhanced evidence-based practice skills for finding and interpreting research. However, postgraduate training should be linked very closely to the student’s workplace, in order to support the transfer of best evidence into practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ciliska D. Evidence-based nursing: how far have we come? What's next? Evid Based Nurs 2006; 9: 38–40.

Dijkstra RF, Braspenning JCC, Huijsmans Z, et al. Patients and nurses determine variation in adher-ence to guidelines at Dutch hospitals more than internists or settings. Diabetic Med 2004; 21: 586–591.

Grol R, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care. Lancet 2003; 3: 1225–1230.

Caldwell K, Coleman K, Copp G, et al. Preparing for professional practice: How well does professional training equip health and social care practitioners to engage in evidence-based practice? Nurse Edu Today 2007; 27: 518–528.

Flores-Mateo G, Argimon JM . Evidence based practice in postgraduate health-care education: a systematic review. BMC Health Services Research 2007; 7: 119.

Del Mar C, Glasziou P, Mayer D, Teaching evidence based medicine. BMJ 2004; 329: 989–990.

Coomarasamy A, Khan KS. What is the evidence that postgraduate teaching in evidence-based medicine changes anything? A systematic review. BMJ2004; 329: 1017.

Straus SE, Richardson WS, Glasziou P, et al Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 3rd Ed. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, 2005.

Carley, K. Content analysis. In: Asher RE (ed) The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Edinburgh: Pergamon Press, 1990.

Jante Law. //en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JanteLaw. Accessed 06 January 2010.

Mckenna HP, Ahton S, Keeney S, Barriers to evidence-based practice in primary care. J Adv NUTS 2004; 45: 178–189.

Gerrish K, Clayton J. Promoting evidence-based practice: an organizational approach. J NUTS Management 2004; 12: 114–123.

Van Achterberg T, Schoonhoven, Grol R, Nursing implementation science: How evidence-based nursing requires evidence-based implementation. J Nurs Scholarship 2008; 40: 302–310.

Meijers JMM, Janssen MAP, Cummings GG, et al Assessing the relationships between contextual factors and research utilization in nursing: systematic literature review. J Adv Nurs 2006; 55: 622–635.

Wallin L, Ewald U, Wikblad K, et al Understanding work contextual factors: A short-cut to evidence-based practice? Worldviews on Evidence-based Nursing 2006; 3: 153–164.

Shaneyfelt T, Baum KD, Bell D, et al Instruments for evaluating education in evidence-based practice. A systematic review. JANIA 2006; 296: 1116–1127.

Downloads

Published

2010-03-01

How to Cite

Graue, M., Bjarkøy, R., Iversen, M., Haugstvedt, A., & Harris, J. (2010). Integrating evidence-based practice into the diabetes nurse curriculum in Bergen: Perceived barriers to finding, reading and using research in practice. International Diabetes Nursing, 7(1), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn.148

Issue

Section

Research Article